Thank you my dear! Hee, #6 didn't do it for you, huh? ;)
I confess my adoration for #1 and #2 are pretty comparable, although with slightly emphasis on different aspects. In my opinion, both men are quite good looking (and neither are flawless, thank God), but I think Jensen is more classically "pretty". Gosh, both of them are so talented in their own ways. In some sense, I see their actings are on the opposite side of the spectrum: for Jamie, I see him as the "intelligent" actor. He approaches his character analytically almost, making very conscious and smart decisions on how to enact the role. Whereas Jensen, I see him as the "intuitive" actor. I think he has an innate sensibility about the character he plays. I almost feel he doesn't think about how to play the role, he becomes the role that he plays while in front of the camera.
no subject
I confess my adoration for #1 and #2 are pretty comparable, although with slightly emphasis on different aspects. In my opinion, both men are quite good looking (and neither are flawless, thank God), but I think Jensen is more classically "pretty". Gosh, both of them are so talented in their own ways. In some sense, I see their actings are on the opposite side of the spectrum: for Jamie, I see him as the "intelligent" actor. He approaches his character analytically almost, making very conscious and smart decisions on how to enact the role. Whereas Jensen, I see him as the "intuitive" actor. I think he has an innate sensibility about the character he plays. I almost feel he doesn't think about how to play the role, he becomes the role that he plays while in front of the camera.
LOL about our moms. Hmmm, that's really funny! ♥